On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 12:54:28PM -0600, Eric Fiselier wrote: > Richard requested this change. Take a look at > https://reviews.llvm.org/D26044 for more rational.
I don't see much rational and in fact, I disagree with some of the mentioned items. E.g. presence of libc++ won't tell you if you can use sized deallocation as that's a ABI library issue. So, why again should clang care about the libc++ version in advance? Joerg _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
