On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 01:49:53PM -0600, Eric Fiselier via cfe-commits wrote: > > E.g. presence of libc++ won't tell you if you can use sized deallocation > > as that's a ABI library issue. > > The value of __libcpp_version could easily be updated by vendors to store > the version of the system dylib, > so I don't see why this wouldn't work.
As I said, this is not a decision based on the libc++ version. When we start adding random extra flags to the version file, it makes the point I'm raising even bigger: we are duplicating data and clang should not be magically changing its behavior like that anyway. Joerg _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
