vgvassilev wrote:

@nikic, thanks for the details! 

Until this change we sailed fairly well with that change. It seems that the pcm 
rigorously records the clang notion of the triple which is probably what we 
want. However, if we are building a pcm in the context of `clang-repl` would it 
make sense to use the `getProcessTriple` notion for that pcm -- that'd be the 
behavior if we used header files instead of a module.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79261
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to