nikic wrote: > Until this change we sailed fairly well. It seems that the pcm rigorously > records the clang notion of the triple which is probably what we want. > However, if we are building a pcm in the context of `clang-repl` would it > make sense to use the `getProcessTriple` notion for that pcm -- that'd be the > behavior if we used header files instead of a module.
The pcm here is being generated by clang, not by clang-repl, so I'm not sure how we would know that we need to switch the triple. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79261 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
