tru wrote:

Honestly - I think going back to *one* style of runtime path is to be preferred 
now. But I don't think it's fair to say that it doesn't solve any problems, 
because we switched to it so that we could ship more platforms in one toolchain 
package without having to add cfg files and similar things to point it to the 
right path. There was some kind of collision we ran into when we where using 
the old path.

I do think the current status quo is confusing and bad, so I rather we go back 
to the old layout if that's what people prefer and I'll have to work around 
that in that case. But it sounds like this needs a RFC.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89775
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to