sdkrystian wrote: @aeubanks I think I'm going to revert this & maybe partially revert the changes in #90152 which cause `operator=` to be treated as a dependent name when the current class is templated. There are lots of edge cases that need to be accounted for. Thoughts @erichkeane ?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91498 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
