erichkeane wrote: > @aeubanks I think I'm going to revert this & maybe partially revert the > changes in #90152 which cause `operator=` to be treated as a dependent name > when the current class is templated. There are lots of edge cases that need > to be accounted for. Thoughts @erichkeane ?
Its sad to do so, but I think it makes the most sense. We've got a good amount of feedback of the breakages, and I think figuring them out and reapplying these changes in a followup patch is a perfectly reasonable way forward. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91498 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
