carlosgalvezp wrote: To be clear and reiterate my previous comment: this check should NOT require users to use at(). That behavior should be opt-in. It should only warn about using operator[]. It's up to the users to figure out what the best replacement is.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90043 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
