HerrCai0907 wrote: > To be clear and reiterate my previous comment: this check should NOT require > users to use at(). That behavior should be opt-in. It should only warn about > using operator[]. It's up to the users to figure out what the best > replacement is.
I don't think it is a good solution. For this kind of projects, they should disable this check directly. Maybe it is optimization to disable this check if exception feature is disabled. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90043 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
