mizvekov wrote: > @mizvekov After looking into the code, I think we should transform qualifier > in TST. Consider the following code:
So the NNS is already dependent, that's great. I still don't understand why you are saying we didn't or can't build a DependentTemplateSpecializationType instead. Yes, the template name needs to stay a DependentTemplateName for that. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94725 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
