mizvekov wrote: > I mean we can transform `QualifiedTemplateName` to `DependentTemplateName` > and this is what this patch does.
But that goes against the natural flow of template instantiation. We can't go back from non-dependent into dependent. We can't transform a regular TemplateName back into a DependentTemplateName, just as we can't go back to DependentTemplateSpecializationType from a TemplateSpecializationType. That's why I find this so confusing... > If we build a `DependentTemplateName` instead of `QualifiedTemplateName` > earlier would affect the code in partial specialization like: > > ```c++ > template<typename T> > struct A<T*>::B<T*> > ``` Can you elaborate on that? That still seems like the right path to me, you probably found another problem, that happens some times. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94725 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
