jhuber6 wrote: > > You could theoretically break this if you didn't go through the C ABI and > > ignored type promotion, but I'm not concerned with that kind of misuse > > since it's against the ABI in the first place. > > The IR has its own ABI that may or may not match whatever the platform "C > ABI' is. Especially given the lack of a formal platform ABI specification, I > would not characterize not using the C ABI as misuse or against the ABI
The ABI in this case is what NVIDIA does, figuring out whether or not an argument came from a struct or was passed directly would be a nightmare of metadata nodes so I *really* don't want to go down that path. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96369 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
