Sirraide wrote: > (to me) it's not really defensible in 2025 that falling off the end of a > function with a non-void return type is anything but an error.
Yeah, agreed. > Specifically, I wonder about `autoconf` I hadn’t thought about that, that’s a good point. > Is that something you've looked into by any chance? I’m not really familiar w/ autoconf, so no, I haven’t. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123470 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
