EricWF added a subscriber: STL_MSFT. EricWF added inline comments.
================ Comment at: docs/LanguageExtensions.rst:996 * ``__is_abstract`` (GNU, Microsoft) +* ``__is_aggregate`` (GNU, Microsoft) * ``__is_base_of`` (GNU, Microsoft) ---------------- aaron.ballman wrote: > Has Microsoft already implemented this? If not, do we want to wait for them > before claiming they implement it as well? I asked @STL_MSFT to ping the frontend team to confirm they were planning on implementing it with this name. I was concerned this doc would never get updated otherwise. ================ Comment at: lib/Sema/SemaExprCXX.cpp:4234 + // support aggregate initialization. GCC mirrors this behavior for vectors + // but not _Complex. + return T->isAggregateType() || T->isVectorType() || T->isExtVectorType() || ---------------- aaron.ballman wrote: > Is there benefit to diverging from GCC's behavior here for _Complex types? `_Complex` types act as if they are an array of 2 elements, and hence support aggregate initialization. Ironically the GCC maintainer who implemented `is_aggregate` pointed this case out to me. I've pinged him to ask why he chose not to support it, or if the change is in the works. https://reviews.llvm.org/D31513 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
