aaron.ballman added inline comments.
================ Comment at: docs/LanguageExtensions.rst:996 * ``__is_abstract`` (GNU, Microsoft) +* ``__is_aggregate`` (GNU, Microsoft) * ``__is_base_of`` (GNU, Microsoft) ---------------- STL_MSFT wrote: > aaron.ballman wrote: > > EricWF wrote: > > > aaron.ballman wrote: > > > > Has Microsoft already implemented this? If not, do we want to wait for > > > > them before claiming they implement it as well? > > > I asked @STL_MSFT to ping the frontend team to confirm they were planning > > > on implementing it with this name. I was concerned this doc would never > > > get updated otherwise. > > Seems reasonable. My concern is that we claim Microsoft implements this > > when they don't (yet) and someone uses this documentation to try to force > > Microsoft's hand. However, it seems that this documentation not being > > updated is the far more likely scenario. ;-) > MS intends to implement this hook under this name. No ETA yet. Lovely, then I'm happy with the documentation as-is. https://reviews.llvm.org/D31513 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
