AaronBallman wrote: > In other words, part of the motivation of this PR is to address a general > issue where Clang fails to cover the set of headers that it ought to.
I think it makes sense for Clang to handle the C Standard Library headers which can introduce `NULL`, but I'm surprised to see us adding new headers like `dbm.h`, the `sys` directory, and `unistd,h`. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149176 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
