hans added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D33900#822313, @mehdi_amini wrote:
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D33900#820281, @hans wrote: > > > In https://reviews.llvm.org/D33900#818968, @mehdi_amini wrote: > > > > > I think @thakis is right: this too verbose to be the default --version. > > > We likely shouldn't ship this in clang-5.0 (@hans). > > > > > > Let me know if you figure out a solution here and I'll merge it. > > > I looped you in because the easy short term answer is: that we take our time > to figure what to do in trunk but in the meantime we just revert from the > release branch. Makes sense. I've reverted r304899 and r304836 in r309285, and r304835 in r309286. https://reviews.llvm.org/D33900 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
