github-actions[bot] wrote:
<!--LLVM CODE FORMAT COMMENT: {clang-format}-->
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
<details>
<summary>
You can test this locally with the following command:
</summary>
``````````bash
git-clang-format --diff origin/main HEAD --extensions cpp --
clang/lib/Sema/SemaType.cpp clang/test/SemaCXX/cxx2b-deducing-this.cpp
--diff_from_common_commit
``````````
:warning:
The reproduction instructions above might return results for more than one PR
in a stack if you are using a stacked PR workflow. You can limit the results by
changing `origin/main` to the base branch/commit you want to compare against.
:warning:
</details>
<details>
<summary>
View the diff from clang-format here.
</summary>
``````````diff
diff --git a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaType.cpp b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaType.cpp
index 46b668b7e..28bb352b1 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaType.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaType.cpp
@@ -4838,7 +4838,7 @@ static TypeSourceInfo
*GetFullTypeForDeclarator(TypeProcessingState &state,
// If there already was an problem with the scope, don’t issue another
// error about the explicit object parameter.
return SS.isInvalid() ||
- isa_and_present<CXXRecordDecl>(S.computeDeclContext(SS));
+ isa_and_present<CXXRecordDecl>(S.computeDeclContext(SS));
};
// C++23 [dcl.fct]p6:
@@ -4858,9 +4858,8 @@ static TypeSourceInfo
*GetFullTypeForDeclarator(TypeProcessingState &state,
// - a lambda-declarator [expr.prim.lambda].
DeclaratorContext C = D.getContext();
ParmVarDecl *First =
- FTI.NumParams
- ? dyn_cast_if_present<ParmVarDecl>(FTI.Params[0].Param)
- : nullptr;
+ FTI.NumParams ? dyn_cast_if_present<ParmVarDecl>(FTI.Params[0].Param)
+ : nullptr;
bool IsFunctionDecl = D.getInnermostNonParenChunk() == &DeclType;
if (First && First->isExplicitObjectParameter() &&
@@ -4877,12 +4876,11 @@ static TypeSourceInfo
*GetFullTypeForDeclarator(TypeProcessingState &state,
!IsClassType(D.getCXXScopeSpec())) {
if (IsFunctionDecl)
S.Diag(First->getBeginLoc(),
- diag::err_explicit_object_parameter_nonmember)
- << /*non-member*/ 2 << /*function*/ 0
- << First->getSourceRange();
+ diag::err_explicit_object_parameter_nonmember)
+ << /*non-member*/ 2 << /*function*/ 0 << First->getSourceRange();
else
S.Diag(First->getBeginLoc(),
- diag::err_explicit_object_parameter_invalid)
+ diag::err_explicit_object_parameter_invalid)
<< First->getSourceRange();
// Do let non-member function have explicit parameters
``````````
</details>
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/174603
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
