================
@@ -533,12 +533,6 @@ bool Parser::isTypeConstraintAnnotation() {
bool Parser::TryAnnotateTypeConstraint() {
if (!getLangOpts().CPlusPlus20)
return false;
- // The type constraint may declare template parameters, notably
- // if it contains a generic lambda, so we need to increment
- // the template depth as these parameters would not be instantiated
- // at the current depth.
- TemplateParameterDepthRAII CurTemplateDepthTracker(TemplateParameterDepth);
- ++CurTemplateDepthTracker;
----------------
mizvekov wrote:
Yeah, this certainly looked wrong, this is not a place in the grammar you would
see an increase in template depth, so props for getting rid of this.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/195995
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
