Thibault-Monnier wrote: > I think llvm/clang as open-source compiler should encourage users who are > aware of performance to use more advanced -march.
@Andarwinux Most people do not compile their own version of Clang (and many distros prefer to remain backwards-compatible). The whole piont of this PR is to allow the performance gain to all users who support this feature rather than those who put their hands on a -march binary. You can still use -march which should (though MaskRay said otherwise?) not cause any regressions, so this seems like a net improvement to me. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/180631 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
