Andarwinux wrote: > > Although this PR itself is insignificant, it will become a precedent - > > people might start adding runtime dispatch everywhere in LLVM - why not? > > Is this really an issue? If we get better backwards-compatible performance, > how is that bad? There's no reason to give distros a reason to switch to > -march if we can do as well without it.
Never mind - since this won't affect x86-64-v2 users, lgtm. Hope eventually we won't need these things anymore. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/180631 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
