================ @@ -1,10 +1,10 @@ -// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++98 %s -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -pedantic-errors -verify-directives -verify=expected,cxx98-23,cxx98-11,cxx98-14,cxx98-17,cxx98 -// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++11 %s -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -pedantic-errors -verify-directives -verify=expected,cxx98-23,cxx98-11,cxx98-14,cxx98-17,since-cxx11 -// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++14 %s -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -pedantic-errors -verify-directives -verify=expected,cxx98-23,cxx98-14,cxx98-17,since-cxx11 -// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++17 %s -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -pedantic-errors -verify-directives -verify=expected,cxx98-23,since-cxx17,cxx98-17,since-cxx11 -// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 %s -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -pedantic-errors -verify-directives -verify=expected,cxx98-23,since-cxx20,since-cxx17,since-cxx11 -// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++23 %s -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -pedantic-errors -verify-directives -verify=expected,cxx98-23,since-cxx23,since-cxx20,since-cxx17,since-cxx11 -// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++2c %s -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -pedantic-errors -verify-directives -verify=expected,since-cxx26,since-cxx23,since-cxx20,since-cxx17,since-cxx11 +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++98 %s -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -pedantic-errors -fno-spell-checking -verify-directives -verify=expected,cxx98-23,cxx98-11,cxx98-14,cxx98-17,cxx98 ---------------- Endilll wrote:
While I agree that spell checking is rarely helpful in C++ DR tests, I very much against introducing those ad-hoc compiler options to random files after all my efforts to make as many tests regular in this regard (and isolating tests with special needs in their own files). CC @shafik @AaronBallman https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/208586 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
