asb marked 4 inline comments as done.
asb added inline comments.

================
Comment at: lib/Driver/ToolChains/RISCV.cpp:86
+    CmdArgs.push_back("-lc");
+    CmdArgs.push_back("-lgloss");
+    CmdArgs.push_back("--end-group");
----------------
asb wrote:
> apazos wrote:
> > mgrang wrote:
> > > How about if our sysroot is linux (as opposed to elf)? There won't be any 
> > > libgloss.a, right? Also there won't be a crt0.o (instead there will be 
> > > crt1.o).
> > Supporting linux target is desirable early on because most of us will be 
> > using Qemu for running tests.
> Linux targets are not currently supported, as they require the ilp32d or 
> lp64d (hard double precision) ABI. The only fiddly part is actually in the 
> Clang frontend, handling structs composed of two reals or one integer + one 
> real. This is obviously high up on the todo list.
It seems I was mistaken - soft float linux targets with glibc are working fine, 
meaning there's no need to wait for hardfloat ABI lowering.

Note that Linux targets are handled in lib/Driver/ToolChains/Linux.cpp


================
Comment at: lib/Driver/ToolChains/RISCV.h:42
+      : GnuTool("RISCV::Linker",
+                TC.getTriple().isArch64Bit() ? "riscv64-ld" : "riscv32-ld",
+                TC) {}
----------------
mgrang wrote:
> johnrusso wrote:
> > I wonder if we should construct the linker name based on the default triple 
> > value?  "riscv64-unknown-elf-ld" or "riscv32-unknown-elf-ld" as this is 
> > likely what is in the user's PATH if they have installed the gnu tools.  
> > The linker name could be modified in ConstructJob if the triple is 
> > different from the default.
> I agree with @johnrusso . I always have errors: "riscv32-ld not found" and as 
> a workaround I end up creating symlink pointing to the actual <triple>-ld.
Now updated so the bin dir from the given GCC install (passed by 
--gcc-toolchain) is added to the PATH, and the default search logic will look 
for an ld named after after the target triple.


https://reviews.llvm.org/D39963



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to