dcoughlin added a comment. Thanks for looking into this!
This checker is in the 'core' package, which means (when moved out of alpha) it will be enabled by default. - Do you think that this checker should be enabled by default for all users of the analyzer? - If users do actually want to use labels in their switch statements, how should they suppress the diagnostics from the checker? - What is the benefit of adding this check in the static analyzer vs. in clang-tidy? (My own sense is that the check for labels that are close to "default" could be on by default but that warning on *any* label inside a switch is more stylistic. I think users should have to opt in to that check.) Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D40715 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
