mclow.lists added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D41368#958865, @zturner wrote:
> It would be better if we could just fix the code. I disagree (See discussion of https://reviews.llvm.org/D39149). Even if it was "just this one place" (which it isn't), this affects users of clang, not just libc++. This is a (small, but significant) barrier to people trying to write correct, portable generic code, and clang is just wrong to warn here. As an aside, I definitely object to "just fix the code". The code is correct as written. I think what you mean is "it would be better if we could just tell the compiler to shut up" (which is what you've proposed - but incompletely) Repository: rCXX libc++ https://reviews.llvm.org/D41368 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
