smeenai added a comment.

@mclow.lists are you okay with this approach? I'm also fine using a cast to 
silence the warning, as @zturner suggested, but we should suppress the warning 
in some way, otherwise libc++ 6 is gonna have compile warnings with clang 6 out 
of the box, which isn't great.

A third alternative, which is the least invasive, though not complete in some 
sense: we just add `-Wno-tautological-constant-compare` to the compile flags 
for libc++ (in CMake), to suppress the warning during libc++'s compilation. 
There's still an instance of the warning in a header, but all other clients of 
the header should treat it as a system header (in which case warnings will be 
suppressed anyway). It's not targeted at all and could suppress legitimate 
instances of the warning though.


Repository:
  rCXX libc++

https://reviews.llvm.org/D41368



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to