jkorous-apple added inline comments.

================
Comment at: clangd/Protocol.h:190
   /// (see exit notification) its process.
-  llvm::Optional<int> processId;
+  llvm::Optional<int> processId = 0;
 
----------------
Sorry if I am asking stupid question but since the type is Optional<> isn't 
it's default-constructed value more appropriate here?


================
Comment at: clangd/Protocol.h:211
   /// The initial trace setting. If omitted trace is disabled ('off').
-  llvm::Optional<TraceLevel> trace;
+  llvm::Optional<TraceLevel> trace = TraceLevel::Off;
 };
----------------
Does it still make more sense to use Optional<TraceLevel> than plain TraceLevel?


Repository:
  rCTE Clang Tools Extra

https://reviews.llvm.org/D43230



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to