jkorous-apple added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clangd/Protocol.h:190 /// (see exit notification) its process. - llvm::Optional<int> processId; + llvm::Optional<int> processId = 0; ---------------- Sorry if I am asking stupid question but since the type is Optional<> isn't it's default-constructed value more appropriate here? ================ Comment at: clangd/Protocol.h:211 /// The initial trace setting. If omitted trace is disabled ('off'). - llvm::Optional<TraceLevel> trace; + llvm::Optional<TraceLevel> trace = TraceLevel::Off; }; ---------------- Does it still make more sense to use Optional<TraceLevel> than plain TraceLevel? Repository: rCTE Clang Tools Extra https://reviews.llvm.org/D43230 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits