Typz added a comment. Hum, not sure I fully got your proposal. So you actually mean that clang-format you format like this (with 4-space indent for clarity):
switch (x) { case 0: break; case 1: { foo(); break; } case 2: { foo(); } break; case 3: { foo(); } bar(); break; } Is this right? If so it does not really help me: I don't care so much how it is formatted, but I think the current way is way too error prone (and I cannot change the style to indent the case blocks themself). So i'll have to keep a patch in my fork :-( Or maybe the behavior should be dependant on `IndentCaseLabels` (though this would change LLVM style formatting) ? Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D43183 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits