djasper added a comment. That doesn't explain to me how this is error prone. I can't think how you'd create an error by this that would not be caught by the compiler. Much less if you consistently use clang-format.
It's fundamentally what you get for IndentCaseLabels: false. Even without braces you have this issue to some extend. But LLVM has several thousand switches, about a thousand with braces formatted this way and I am not aware of a single time this has caused a bug or even confusion. And to me (but this is obviously objective), your suggestions hide the structure of the code even more as they lead to a state where the closing brace is not aligned with the start of the line/statement that contains the opening braces. That looks like a bug to me more than anything else and I don't think there is another situation where clang-format would do that. Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D43183 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
