jdenny added a comment.

In https://reviews.llvm.org/D43248#1036427, @echristo wrote:

> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D43248#1036426, @aaron.ballman wrote:
>
> > In https://reviews.llvm.org/D43248#1036409, @jdenny wrote:
> >
> > > I'd prefer to move it than to expect people to obey such a comment.  
> > > Let's see what Aaron says.
> >
> >
> > I have a slight preference for moving the tests now that I know they're 
> > causing problems, unless that turns out to be overly onerous for some 
> > reason.
> >
> > Thank you, @echristo for pointing out the issues with the tests, I hadn't 
> > considered that.
>
>
> No worries :)
>
> That said, please don't revert and reapply to move. Just a followup commit is 
> just fine - and whenever you get a chance. (Though if you let me know when 
> you do I'd appreciate it :)


Sure.

So, I'm planning to remove test/Frontend/ast-attr.cpp, rename 
test/Sema/attr-print.cpp to test/Misc/attr-print-emit.cpp, and change its run 
lines to:

  // RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -ast-print | FileCheck %s
  // RUN: %clang -emit-ast -o %t.ast %s
  // RUN: %clang_cc1 %t.ast -ast-print | FileCheck %s

That seems to work fine locally.  I'll just leave the old 
test/Sema/attr-print.c alone as it's not part of this problem.  Any objections?


Repository:
  rC Clang

https://reviews.llvm.org/D43248



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to