ilya-biryukov added a comment. Sorry for the delay.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D42966#1069674, @mikhail.ramalho wrote: > Sure. Basically, the previous code would not generate the USR for the > function's parameters. > The issue was that SM.getFileEntryForID would return NULL because there is > no actual file Why wasn't there a file for function parameter? Function parameters *are* declared in some file, or am I missing something? More general question is: how do we want USRs for function parameters to work, specifically should USR of the same param of different declarations be the same or different? Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D42966 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits