lebedev.ri added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D46159#1085684, @dcoughlin wrote:
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D46159#1085548, @pfultz2 wrote: > > > > Do you have some better choices? > > > > I could do `-allow-alpha-checks`. What do you think? > > > That seems reasonable to me. > Although I like `-allow-enabling-alpha-checks` better because it is longer > and will therefore discourage its use. This sounds good to me too. Conveys the idea that it only *allows* to enable them, not actually enables them. > Do you think it would be possible to have a mechanism that prevents people > from turning on all alpha checks at once? That is what I'm worried about. > People enabling individual alpha checks to test them out is fine, but people > enabling all of them is not a good experience. While in this particular case it may make sense, it also may open the road for restricting/removing `-checks=*` support, which would be **quite** unfortunate :/ Repository: rCTE Clang Tools Extra https://reviews.llvm.org/D46159 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
