alexfh added a comment.
As Devin says (and as we discussed this with Anna Zaks) alpha checkers are
still in development, so we don't want to expose them to the users, even very
curious ones. For those who want to help with development of the alpha
checkers, there's always a possibility to change one boolean literal in
clang-tidy sources and build their own clang-tidy binary. Or one can use clang
-analyze. Are there any use cases not covered by these two options?
================
Comment at: clang-tidy/ClangTidy.cpp:373-376
// FIXME: Remove this option once clang's cfg-temporary-dtors option defaults
// to true.
AnalyzerOptions->Config["cfg-temporary-dtors"] =
Context.getOptions().AnalyzeTemporaryDtors ? "true" : "false";
----------------
NoQ wrote:
> Btw this is already enabled by default.
Should we kill the flag completely?
Repository:
rCTE Clang Tools Extra
https://reviews.llvm.org/D46159
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
