alexfh accepted this revision.
alexfh added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
Given Artem's answer (and if there are no objections from other CSA
maintainers), I have no concerns with this patch going in. A couple of minor
nits.
================
Comment at: clang-tidy/ClangTidyDiagnosticConsumer.h:190-191
+ /// \brief Turns on experimental alpha checkers from the static analyzer.
+ bool isAlphaChecksAllowed() const {
+ return AllowEnablingAnalyzerAlphaCheckers;
----------------
Let's call this function more consistently with all other instances of this
setting, e.g. canEnableAnalyzerAlphaCheckers() (alternatively,
mayEnableAnalyzerAlphaCheckers) and change the comment to be in line with the
actual meaning of the function (it doesn't turn on alpha checkers, it merely
allows them to be enabled).
================
Comment at: test/clang-tidy/enable-alpha-checks.cpp:1
+// Check if '-allow-enabling-analyzer-alpha-checkers' is visible for users
+// RUN: clang-tidy -help | not grep 'allow-enabling-analyzer-alpha-checkers'
----------------
nit: Add a trailing period.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D46159
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
