Hello Ana, Suresh and Sheng,
I read your document and noted the following typos:
Section 3:
theaforementioned => the aforementioned
Section 5:
"the attacks against hash functions hash attacks" => "the attacks
against hash functions"
Also, I see that section 4 from the -09 version has been removed ("Support
for the hash agility in SEND"). I read the IESG evaluation record and I
fail to see why this part was removed. Could you detail this decision ?
IMHO, this section was especially important because RFC 4982 only
describes CGA related issues and not SEND issues.
Regards,
Tony
_______________________________________________
CGA-EXT mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cga-ext