Hello Ana, Suresh and Sheng,

I read your document and noted the following typos:

Section 3:
theaforementioned => the aforementioned

Section 5:
"the attacks against hash functions hash attacks" => "the attacks
against hash functions"

Also, I see that section 4 from the -09 version has been removed ("Support for the hash agility in SEND"). I read the IESG evaluation record and I fail to see why this part was removed. Could you detail this decision ? IMHO, this section was especially important because RFC 4982 only describes CGA related issues and not SEND issues.

Regards,
        Tony
_______________________________________________
CGA-EXT mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cga-ext

Reply via email to