Hi Tony,
Thanks for the comments.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tony Cheneau [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2010 12:00 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Typos in draft-ietf-csi-hash-threat-10 + little comment
>
> Hello Ana, Suresh and Sheng,
>
> I read your document and noted the following typos:
>
> Section 3:
> theaforementioned => the aforementioned
>
> Section 5:
> "the attacks against hash functions hash attacks" => "the
> attacks against hash functions"
Will fix these.
>
> Also, I see that section 4 from the -09 version has been
> removed ("Support for the hash agility in SEND"). I read the
> IESG evaluation record and I fail to see why this part was
> removed. Could you detail this decision ?
> IMHO, this section was especially important because RFC 4982
> only describes CGA related issues and not SEND issues.
There was a conscious decision made not to delve into the
solution space and this was the reason the hash agility support
section was removed. The WG consensus for the document was only
to analyze the threats and not propose solutions. The earlier
versions of the documents were stretching this consensus a bit
but the latest version is in line. This does not imply that the
hash agility solution is not needed or is unworkable :-) just
that it is out of the scope of this document.
Cheers
Suresh
_______________________________________________
CGA-EXT mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cga-ext
