Pascal Sartoretti wrote: > > The only cases of sync which really work are the "homogeneous" ones : > Chandler PC = Chandler hub, Palm OS = Palm desktop, Toodledo iPhone app = > Toodledo web app. >
The range of products/services that work well together is, happily, greater than this. Chandler Server (Cosmo) provides excellent services to CalDAV clients and to (Morse Code client) Chandler Desktop. Focusing on sync, in my experience: * the combination of Chandler Hub services with clients such as Apple iCal, Mozilla Sunbird/Lightning and Chandler Desktop is close to perfect * other servers have merit, and I expect that interop/sync (keyword: CalDAV) will continue to improve Looking ahead: * iPhone OS 3.0, expected summer 2009, will support CalDAV; again, I expect that sync with Chandler Hub will be close to perfect. > I don't think that the (limited) resources of the Chandler project should > spend time on synchro with other applications. > Much work is already done; think CalDAV and iCalendar. The summary from the report of the October 2008 event: > This meeting was our largest interoperability event to date. Eight > CalDAV servers and 4 CalDAV clients were tested as well as > iCalendar, iMIP and iTIP. > > The most significant takeaway from this event was CalDAV clients > were able to test with the majority of the servers. In the past, > because things were often not finished or applications had issues, > it was not possible to complete testing. The fact that one client > was able to successfully test against 8 servers during a two day > process shows tremendous progress. I look forward to the next set > of testing to see how much improvement has been made, particularly > with respect to CalDAV scheduling. > > With regards to iCalendar testing general interoperability worked > far better than it has in the past and it is clear that strong > interoperability efforts have been and are being made by many of > the vendors present. I look forward to the full report on the February 2009 Roundtable XIV, which was hosted by Microsoft. > Participants in the IOP test included Apple, IBM, Microsoft, > PeopleCube, and Yahoo!/Zimbra. > It would be more helpful to enhance import tools, e.g. a CSV import for > people who want to migrate from various tools (MS Outlool, Toodledo, Palm, > OS X Mail, etc...) to Chandler. > Chandler Desktop import from .ics is already very good. Chandler interop with e-mail clients and e-mail servers is a different story. One of the foundations to this should be: support for rich text. Regards Graham References: <http://chandlerproject.org/Projects/CosmoArchitecture> <https://bugzilla.osafoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12222> <http://calconnect.org/> <http://calconnect.org/roundtable14rpt.shtml> <http://calconnect.org/eventreports.shtml#calconnectiops> <http://calconnect.org/pubdocs/CD0807%20October%202008%20CalConnect%20Interoperability%20Test%20Report.pdf> -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Chandler-and-Toodledo-tp2500976p2517619.html Sent from the Chandler users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list unsubscribe here: http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-users Chandler wiki: http://chandlerproject.org/wikihome
