(Inspired by a conversation...)

Currently, 13 : tries to form a tacit verb.

But that doesn't always work, and it falls back to composing a 3 : or
4 : definition depending on the presence of x.

Of course, sometimes the resulting verb has an empty domain:

   13 : '(x'

But there's another option, in some cases, which is that it could be
forming an adverb.

In other words,

   13 : 'x&+ y'

could return

   1 : 'm&+ y'

Something for the todo list...

Thanks,

-- 
Raul
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to