Before "improvements" like this, it would be nice to fix long-standing bugs like this: 13 : 'y+y' +
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 9:15 AM, Raul Miller <[email protected]> wrote: > (Inspired by a conversation...) > > Currently, 13 : tries to form a tacit verb. > > But that doesn't always work, and it falls back to composing a 3 : or > 4 : definition depending on the presence of x. > > Of course, sometimes the resulting verb has an empty domain: > > 13 : '(x' > > But there's another option, in some cases, which is that it could be > forming an adverb. > > In other words, > > 13 : 'x&+ y' > > could return > > 1 : 'm&+ y' > > Something for the todo list... > > Thanks, > > -- > Raul > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > -- Devon McCormick, CFA ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
