Does "moving it into user space" mean there would be something like a d2t (direct-to-tacit) or tfd (tacit-from-direct) defined verb? Is there any code started on this? Having it in J would make me more inclined to hack it.
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 11:41 AM, Raul Miller <[email protected]> wrote: > Go for it. > > Thanks, > > -- > Raul > > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 9:33 AM, Devon McCormick <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Before "improvements" like this, it would be nice to fix long-standing > bugs > > like this: > > 13 : 'y+y' > > + > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 9:15 AM, Raul Miller <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> (Inspired by a conversation...) > >> > >> Currently, 13 : tries to form a tacit verb. > >> > >> But that doesn't always work, and it falls back to composing a 3 : or > >> 4 : definition depending on the presence of x. > >> > >> Of course, sometimes the resulting verb has an empty domain: > >> > >> 13 : '(x' > >> > >> But there's another option, in some cases, which is that it could be > >> forming an adverb. > >> > >> In other words, > >> > >> 13 : 'x&+ y' > >> > >> could return > >> > >> 1 : 'm&+ y' > >> > >> Something for the todo list... > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> -- > >> Raul > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Devon McCormick, CFA > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > -- Devon McCormick, CFA ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
