Sorry, they are m's and n's not u's and v's. /Erling
On 2016-08-11 09:49, Erling Hellenäs wrote:
No, it's about the u's and v's in the J documentation which contain
constant values. Constant values which can not be set from variables
in tacit J code. There is also a possibility to set comparison
tolerance after a verb. There are hidden constant values set in the
interpreter, like the start values used by Insert for some verbs, and
probably many other things like this. /Erling
On 2016-08-10 22:14, Joe Bogner wrote:
It would be helpful possibly to include some psuedocode (or real
code) in
your articles to make the points more clear.
It's not clear to me what the article is arguing or asking. I don't
understand this statement - "We can have boxed arguments and we
should use
them and remove all variables set in the interpreter, as I see it."
Does this mean to remove the auto x & y?
In other words
Instead of
add =: 4 : 0
x+y
)
add =: 4 : 0
'x y' = [box ?]
x + y
)
Is that what you are suggesting?
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 11:13 AM, Erling Hellenäs
<[email protected]>
wrote:
https://erlhelinfotech.wordpress.com/2016/08/05/jwithatwist-
number-of-arguments/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
