On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 08:24:41PM -0600, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: > On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 13:30:11 +0000, Matthew Toseland > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [ re: dual-network nodes ] > > > It's a massive hack and I'm amazed it works... > > Well, the term "massive hack" is a little misleading. It's really just > a simple adjustment of a few variables.
Well, the way the code was designed is such that it is SUPPOSED to disconnect from incompatible nodes. Hence my amazement that it works. > > > my understanding is > > that the code will disconnect if you try to do this.. > > No, actually, it does work, and rather well at that. On my unstable > node, the stable nodes I've been regularly connecting with are some of > my biggest "producers". Check this out (this is from a recently > restarted node): Then there's a bug... :( > > Peer node version Messages Data sent Data received > Fred,0.5,STABLE-1.51,5101 142105:13157 15 MiB 1,929 KiB > Fred,0.5,STABLE-1.51,5101 66454:77763 6,062 KiB 11 MiB > Fred,0.5,STABLE-1.51,5101 51556:13525 4,382 KiB 1,995 KiB -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ chat mailing list chat@freenetproject.org Archived: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.general Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/chat Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
