On 28 Mar 2008, at 12:14, Alberto Caso wrote: > El vie, 28-03-2008 a las 09:05 +0100, Alvaro Lopez Ortega escribió: >> The only remaining problem is that distribution may not be able to >> integrate other packages with Cherokee 0.6; at least not as easily as >> with Cherokee 0.5 (Previously, the only thing they had to do was to >> drop a little configuration file in the mods-enabled directory). > > That alone is enough reason for trying to support splitted files :)
Let's try to be pragmatic here. Cherokee-admin does not support splitted files, and moreover it will not support it in the near future. In fact, I am not even sure whether it is desirable thing to implement in Cherokee. It looks much more like the "less stinky" solution for dealing with text plain configuration files. Cherokee 0.5 used splitted configuration files because it was the best solution at that point, but things have changed a lot since then. In fact, I have put a whole lot of work to get rid of it. In my opinion, it would make much more sense to allow the web based applications to 'enhance' cherokee-admin by adding some sort of definitions file. In fact, *the server configuration* is a single thing that ought to be treated as such. Let's try not to copy the workarounds that other projects were forced to implement. We should try to thing ahead that! -- Greetings, alo. _______________________________________________ Cherokee mailing list [email protected] http://cherokee-project.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cherokee
