[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>>- Firstly of all, I add some other benchmarks: CPU and memory usage > >> If the network supports the load, it is likely it will be 100%, >> which makes perfect sense: The server will try to process as many >> requests as possible, and hence it will consume all the processor >> resources; a different behaviour would be considered a bug. > > Eh? Sorry, I mean how much % of CPU and how much memory cherokee > spends while it's serving pages. Perhaps there is a confusion: you > talk me about network. Is it the answer to next question?
You can measure the memory, but for the CPU load - if your network supports the throughput - will be 100%. Make the test if you don't believe it ;-) >>>- Can you compar with lighttpd?. In this page, its creator says >>> that it's fast web server. I would like to know how fast > > Anwer? Yep.. we will include it. > Sorry, but I don't know any programmer techniques. Or, at least, any > of such for write a script with repositories features. I only > suggest you to make this script for automatically have updated > benchmarks. Even if it looks like a good idea, I think there are more important things to do right now, at least in the Cherokee development side. Anyway, I would be great to have that system up and running :) -- Greetings, alo. http://www.alobbs.com _______________________________________________ Cherokee mailing list Cherokee@lists.alobbs.com http://www.alobbs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cherokee
