> On Tue, 26 Feb 2013, Brad Garrett wrote:
>
>> I really don't want to get into the whole manual compiling business. The
>> package should be robust enough.
>> Am 26.02.2013 um 10:53 schrieb Stefan de Konink <[email protected]>:
>>
>>> On Tue, 26 Feb 2013, Brad Garrett wrote:
>>
>>> I really don't want to get into the whole manual compiling business. The
>>> package should be robust enough.
>>
>> You updated ;) Not us.
>
> Seriously?? Is this supposed to be an official statement?
I am sure Stefan was just joking, don't take it too seriously.
But Cherokee on Github and Cherokee in the Ubuntu repositories are two totally
different spheres of responsibility. The Ubuntu package is **OLD** and I am
99,9% sure that the compiled version is working. If someone would be able to
maintain the Ubuntu packages, they would be up to date. It's not something that
is ignored on purpose.
Once you are into compiling, there is no real difference in upgrading a
package, or upgrading the compiled version. If you need help compiling, or have
questions, ask here, or ask me directly.
Stadtpirat
_______________________________________________
Cherokee mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee
