Re: [Chevelle-List] re: 64 SS/Paint

[Richard Milkiewicz]

That's correct Lance. And that's what Tom should put on his car for an original look. Rich ----- Original Message ----- From: Wurzbacher, Lance To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 2:42 PM Subject: RE: [Chevelle-List] re: 64 SS/Paint Factory GM paint for that era was acrylic lacquer.  Acrylic Enamel didn't start until sometime in the mid 70's I think.   Lance -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 11:05 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Chevelle-List] re: 64 SS/Paint In a message dated 3/25/02 12:56:06 PM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Rich, I agree and I like the lacquer finish over a 2 step base coat clear coat paint. I have seen many very nice base coat clear coats.  Still on a personal opinion think lacquer is just number 1 with a beautiful glass finish that cannot be matched.  But I also know lacquer is an unforgiving finish to chips, long term maintenance, etc., whereas the 2 step paints are just so durable. Dwaine                     Ok, but which way most represents the way in which would be factory original? Tom