Yes the "Easy Fill" type will not require a funnel to load. I have the one with the screw on type and can see the advantage.Godspeed, Dan Solomon"It is a mistake to allow any mechanical object to realize you are in a hurry."http://www.freewebs.com/chevelles1970/
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 19:57:31 -0400Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] Sandblaster Question: Off Topic So I’m assuming the second one has some kind of cap or plug that closes off the fill hole. I see that the first one has a closeable screw on cap over the fill hole. Kyle From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick SchaeferSent: Monday, June 09, 2008 7:48 PMTo: The Chevelle Mailing ListSubject: Re: [Chevelle-list] Sandblaster Question: Off Topic They operate the same, only difference is capacity. I have the first one & used it this AM for the first time in ages, worked fine for me. With either of those, you will need a 60 or 80 gallon compressor. I just upgraded my compressor last fall, today was the first time I used it with the larger tank. I was using a 30 gallon sears compressor & I was continuosly waiting for it to refill. The new (60 gal) was not near so annoying. On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 6:41 PM, Kyle Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Just wanted to run this past the list before I made the wrong decision. Well, I'm looking for a small sandblaster for small jobs. And I noticed that one has a different look vs. the other so I'm sure the is a difference in something, I'm just not sure which is better. They are both similar in price but which one is better? Any pros or cons of one vs. the other. Thanks for any input. http://www.harborfreight.com/cpi/ctaf/Displayitem.taf?itemnumber=95014 http://www.harborfreight.com/cpi/ctaf/displayitem.taf?Itemnumber=93889 Thanks, Kyle -- Rick Schaefer72 TPI El Camino
