[chhattisgarh-net] Digest Number 1647

chhattisgarh-net Sun, 12 Oct 2008 05:13:14 -0700

Title: chhattisgarh-net

Messages In This Digest (8 Messages)

1.: Salwa Judum ko clean chit From: vcadantewada ashram

2.: No Brick In The Wall From: Gladson Dungdung

3a.: Re: Chhattisgarh Police Chief at Berkeley: A Report From: rahul
3b.: Re: Chhattisgarh Police Chief at Berkeley: A Report From: rahul
3c.: Re: Chhattisgarh Police Chief at Berkeley: A Report From: G MANJU SAINATH

4a.: Re: Salwa Judum gets NHRC clean chit, Naxals the blame From: rahul

5a.: Re: Revenge of a woman From: rahul

6a.: Stetsman edit on NHRC report From: Nandini Sundar

View All Topics | Create New Topic

Messages

1.: Salwa Judum ko clean chit

Posted by: "vcadantewada ashram" [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Sat Oct 11, 2008 9:36 am (PDT)

'' ¦à¤¸à¤²à¤µà¤¾ ¦à¤¼à¥¡à¤¡à¥¢à¤® ¦à¤µà¥«
¦à¤µà¥à¤²à¥ à¤¨ ¦à¤ºà¤¿à¤¿'' ¦à¤§à¤¸
¦à¤¸à¤ªà¥à¤¤à¤¾à¤¹ ¦à¤¯à¤µ ¦à¤¹à¥ ¦à¤¦à¤¿à¤¨
¦à¤¯à¤µ ¦à¤¹à¥ ¦à¤¼à¥¨à¤¸à¥
¦à¤¹à¥§à¤¡à¤²à¤¾à¤¨à¤¨ ¦à¤¸à¤à¥ ¦à¤¸à¤®à¤¾à¤ºà¤¾à¤°
¦à¤ªà¤¤à¥à¤°à¥«à¤¢ ¦à¤®à¥§à¤¢ ¦à¤»à¤ªà¥ ¦à¤µà¤¿
'' ¦à¤¸à¤²à¤µà¤¾ ¦à¤¼à¥¡à¤¡à¥¢à¤® ¦à¤µà¥«
¦à¤µà¥à¤²à¥ à¤¨ ¦à¤ºà¤¿à¤¿'' ¦à¥¤ ¦à¤¥à¤¨à¥à¤¦à¤°
¦à¤¶à¤¬à¤° ¦à¤¯à¤¹ ¦à¤¥à¥ ¦à¤µà¤¿
¦à¤°à¤¾à¤·à¥à¤¿à¥à¤°à¥ à¤¯
¦à¤®à¤¾à¤¨à¤µà¤¾à¤§à¤¿à¤µà¤¾à¤° ¦à¤¦à¤¯à¥«à¤· ¦à¤¨à¥§
¦à¤¸à¤°à¥à¤µà¥«à¤ºà¥à¤º ¦à¤¨à¥à¤¯à¤¾à¤¯à¤¾à¤²à¤¯
¦à¤µà¥§ ¦à¤¨à¤¿à¤°à¥à¤¦à¥§à¤¶ ¦à¤ªà¤° ¦à¤¸à¤²à¤µà¤¾
¦à¤¼à¥¡à¤¡à¥¢à¤® ¦à¤µà¥§ ¦à¤µà¤¿à¤°à¥¢à¤¦à¥à¤§
¦à¤µà¥ ¦à¤·à¤¨ ¦à¥§à¥¬à¥®
¦à¤¶à¤¿à¤µà¤¾à¤¯à¤¤à¥«à¤¢ ¦à¤µà¥ ¦à¤¼à¤¾à¤¡à¤º
¦à¤µà¥ ¦à¤¤à¤¥à¤¾ ¦à¤¸à¤à¥
¦à¤¶à¤¿à¤µà¤¾à¤¯à¤¤à¥§à¤¢ ¦à¤«à¤°à¥à¤¼à¥
¦à¤ªà¤¾à¤¨ ¦à¤·à¤¨à¥¤ ¦à¤®à¥¡à¤½à¥§ ¦à¤ªà¥¢à¤°à¤¾
¦à¤µà¤¿à¤¶à¥à¤µà¤¾à¤¸ ¦à¤¹à¥¨ ¦à¤§à¤¸ ¦à¤¶à¤¬à¤°
¦à¤µà¥« ¦à¤»à¤¾à¤ªà¤¨à¥§ ¦à¤µà¤¾à¤²à¥§
¦à¤µà¤¿à¤¸à¥ ¦à¤à¥ ¦à¤¥à¤¶à¤¬à¤¾à¤° ¦à¤µà¥§
¦à¤¸à¤®à¥à¤ªà¤¾à¤¦à¤µ ¦à¤¨à¥§
¦à¤°à¤¾à¤·à¥à¤¿à¥à¤°à¥ à¤¯
¦à¤®à¤¾à¤¨à¤µà¤¾à¤§à¤¿à¤µà¤¾à¤° ¦à¤¦à¤¯à¥«à¤· ¦à¤µà¥
¦à¤°à¤¿à¤ªà¥«à¤°à¥à¤¿ ¦à¤µà¥« ¦à¤¸à¥à¤µà¤¯à¤¢
¦à¤¨à¤¹à¥ à¤¢ ¦à¤ªà¥½à¤¾ ¦à¤¹à¥«à¤·à¤¾à¥¤
¦à¤®à¥§à¤°à¥§ ¦à¤¸à¤¾à¤®à¤¨à¥§
¦à¤°à¤¾à¤·à¥à¤¿à¥à¤°à¥ à¤¯
¦à¤®à¤¾à¤¨à¤µà¤¾à¤§à¤¿à¤µà¤¾à¤° ¦à¤¦à¤¯à¥«à¤· ¦à¤µà¥
¦à¤°à¤¿à¤ªà¥«à¤°à¥à¤¿ ¦à¤°à¤¶à¥ ¦à¤¹à¥¨
¦à¤§à¤¸à¤µà¥§ ¦à¤ªà¥£à¤·à¥à¤ ¦à¤¸à¤¢à¤¶à¥à¤¯à¤¾
¦à¥¯à¥¬ ¦à¤ªà¤° ¦à¤®à¤¾à¤¿à¤µà¤¾à¥¼à¤¾ ¦à¤¸à¤²à¤µà¤¾
¦à¤¼à¥¡à¤¡à¥¢à¤® ¦à¤µà¥¨à¤®à¥à¤ª ¦à¤®à¥§à¤¢
¦à¤°à¤¹à¤¨à¥§ ¦à¤µà¤¾à¤²à¥§ ¦à¤¤à¥ à¤¨
¦à¤¦à¤¦à¤¿à¤µà¤¾à¤¸à¤¯à¥«à¤¢ ¦à¤µà¥ ¦à¤¹à¤¤à¥à¤¯à¤¾
¦à¤µà¥§ ¦à¤®à¤¾à¤®à¤²à¥§ ¦à¤®à¥§à¤¢ ¦à¤¦à¤¯à¥«à¤·
¦à¤¨à¥§ ¦à¤¥à¤ªà¤¨à¥ ¦à¤°à¤¿à¤ªà¥«à¤°à¥à¤¿
¦à¤®à¥§à¤¢ ¦à¤²à¤¿à¤¶à¤¾ ¦à¤¹à¥¨ ¦à¤µà¤¿
¦à¤©à¤¨à¤µà¥ ¦à¤®à¥£à¤¤à¤µà¥«à¤¢ ¦à¤µà¥
¦à¤µà¤¿à¤§à¤µà¤¾à¤³à¤¢ ¦à¤µà¥§ ¦à¤¬à¤¯à¤¾à¤¨
¦à¤µà¥§ ¦à¤¥à¤¨à¥¡à¤¸à¤¾à¤° ¦à¤©à¤¨à¤µà¥§
¦à¤ªà¤¤à¤¿ ¦à¤µà¥ ¦à¤¹à¤¤à¥à¤¯à¤¾ ¦à¤ªà¥¡à¤²à¤¿à¤¸
¦à¤ºà¥¬à¤µà¥ ¦à¤ªà¥à¤°à¤à¤¾à¤°à¥
'' ¦à¤ªà¤¿à¥§à¤²'' ¦à¤´à¤° ¦à¤¯à¤¸. ¦à¤ªà¥ . ¦à¤³.
¦à¤µà¥«à¤¸à¤¾ ¦à¤´à¤° ¦à¤«à¥«à¤¿à¥¢ ¦à¤¨à¥§
¦à¤µà¥ ¦à¤¹à¥¨à¥¤ ¦à¤§à¤¸ ¦à¤¹à¤¤à¥à¤¯à¤¾
¦à¤µà¤¾à¤¢à¤¡ ¦à¤µà¥§ ¦à¤ºà¤¶à¥à¤®à¤¦à¥ à¤¦
¦à¤·à¤µà¤¾à¤¹ ¦à¤¸à¥«à¤®à¤¡à¥¢ ¦à¤¨à¥§ ¦à¤à¥
¦à¤¸à¥à¤µà¤¯à¤¢ ¦à¤ªà¥¡à¤²à¤¿à¤¸
¦à¤¥à¤§à¤¿à¤µà¤¾à¤°à¥ ¦à¤¤à¤¥à¤¾
¦à¤¯à¤¸. ¦à¤ªà¥ . ¦à¤³. ¦à¤µà¥« ¦à¤®à¥£à¤¤à¤µà¥«
¦à¤µà¥« ¦à¤®à¤¾à¤°à¤¤à¥§ ¦à¤¹à¥¡à¤¯à¥§
¦à¤¦à¥§à¤¶à¤¾à¥¤ ¦à¤¹à¤® (
¦à¤°à¤¾à¤·à¥à¤¿à¥à¤°à¥ à¤¯
¦à¤®à¤¾à¤¨à¤µà¤¾à¤§à¤¿à¤µà¤¾à¤° ¦à¤¦à¤¯à¥«à¤· ¦à¤µà¥§
¦à¤¸à¤¦à¤¸à¥à¤¯) ¦à¤µà¥«à¤¤à¤°à¤¾à¤ªà¤¾à¤²
¦à¤·à¥à¤°à¤¾à¤® ¦à¤·à¤¯à¥§ ¦à¤¤à¤¥à¤¾ ¦à¤¹à¤®à¤¨à¥§
¦à¤µà¤¹à¥© ¦à¤²à¥«à¤·à¥«à¤¢ ¦à¤¸à¥§ ¦à¤¬à¤¾à¤¤
¦à¤µà¥ ¦à¤¤à¤¥à¤¾ ¦à¤©à¤¨à¥à¤¹à¥«à¤¨à¥§à¤¢
¦à¤¹à¤®à¥§à¤¢ ¦à¤¬à¤¤à¤¾à¤¯à¤¾ ¦à¤µà¤¿ ¦à¤§à¤¨
¦à¤¤à¥ à¤¨ ¦à¤²à¥«à¤·à¥«à¤¢ ¦à¤µà¥« ¦à¤¸à¤°
¦à¤¸à¥§ ¦à¤¬à¥¡à¤²à¤¾à¤µà¤° ¦à¤²à¥§ ¦à¤¼à¤¾à¤µà¤°
¦à¤ªà¥¡à¤²à¤¿à¤¸ ¦à¤´à¤° ¦à¤¯à¤¸. ¦à¤ªà¥ . ¦à¤³.
¦à¤¨à¥§ ¦à¤®à¤¾à¤°à¤¾à¥¤ ¦à¤¹à¤®à¤¨à¥§ (
¦à¤°à¤¾à¤·à¥à¤¿à¥à¤°à¥ à¤¯
¦à¤®à¤¾à¤¨à¤µà¤¾à¤§à¤¿à¤µà¤¾à¤° ¦à¤¦à¤¯à¥«à¤· ¦à¤µà¥§
¦à¤¸à¤¦à¤¸à¥à¤¯) ¦à¤¨à¥§ ¦à¤ªà¥¡à¤²à¤¿à¤¸
¦à¤¦à¥à¤µà¤¾à¤°à¤¾ ¦à¤¦à¤°à¥à¤¼ ¦à¤µà¥ ¦à¤·à¤¨
¦à¤ªà¥à¤°à¤¾à¤¥à¤®à¤¿à¤µà¥ ¦à¤¦à¥§à¤¶à¥
¦à¤¼à¤¿à¤¸à¤®à¥§à¤¢ ¦à¤¦à¤°à¥à¤¶à¤¾à¤¯à¤¾ ¦à¤·à¤¯à¤¾
¦à¤¹à¥¨ ¦à¤µà¤¿ ¦à¥§à¥® ¦à¤®à¤¾à¤°à¥à¤º ¦à¤µà¥§
¦à¤¶à¤¾à¤® ¦à¤µà¥« ¦à¤¥à¤¼à¥à¤¾à¤¾à¤¤
¦à¤¨à¤µà¥à¤¸à¤²à¥ ¦à¤§à¤¨à¤µà¥§
( ¦à¤®à¥£à¤¤à¤µà¥«à¤¢) ¦à¤µà¥§ ¦à¤¸à¤° ¦à¤¦à¤¯à¥§
¦à¤´à¤° ¦à¤¹à¤®à¤¾à¤°à¥ ¦à¤®à¥ à¤¿à¤¿à¤¢à¤·
¦à¤®à¥§à¤¢ ¦à¤¨à¤¹à¥ à¤¢ ¦à¤¦à¤¤à¥§ ¦à¤¹à¥«
¦à¤¬à¥«à¤²à¤µà¤° ¦à¤¥à¤ªà¤¨à¥§ ¦à¤¸à¤¾à¤¥ ¦à¤²à¥§
¦à¤·à¤¯à¥§ ¦à¤´à¤° ¦à¤¥à¤·à¤²à¥§ ¦à¤¦à¤¿à¤¨
¦à¤©à¤¨à¤µà¥§ ¦à¤¶à¤µ ¦à¤¨à¤¦à¥ ¦à¤µà¥§
¦à¤µà¤¿à¤¨à¤¾à¤°à¥§ ¦à¤¬à¤°à¤¾à¤®à¤¦ ¦à¤¹à¥¡à¤¯à¥¤
¦à¤®à¥£à¤¤à¤µà¥«à¤¢ ¦à¤µà¥ ¦à¤µà¤¿à¤§à¤µà¤¾à¤³à¤¢
¦à¤µà¤¾ ¦à¤µà¤¹à¤¨à¤¾ ¦à¤¹à¥¨ ¦à¤µà¤¿
¦à¤¦à¤°à¥«à¤ªà¥ ¦à¤ªà¥¡à¤²à¤¿à¤¸
¦à¤¥à¤§à¤¿à¤µà¤¾à¤°à¥ ¦à¤¦à¥à¤µà¤¾à¤°à¤¾
¦à¤©à¤¨à¤¸à¥§ '' ¦à¤µà¥«à¤°à¥§ ¦à¤µà¤¾à¤·à¤¼à¥«à¤¢
¦à¤ªà¤° ¦à¤¹à¤¸à¥à¤¤à¤µà¥à¤·à¤° ¦à¤µà¤°à¤¾à¤¯à¥§
¦à¤·à¤¯à¥§'' ¦à¤¤à¤¥à¤¾ ¦à¤¹à¤®à¤¾à¤°à¥§
¦à¤¦à¥à¤µà¤¾à¤°à¤¾ ¦à¤¸à¥à¤¥à¤²
¦à¤¨à¤¿à¤°à¥ à¤µà¥à¤·à¤£ ¦à¤µà¤°à¤¨à¥§ ¦à¤ªà¤°
¦à¤ªà¤¾à¤¯à¤¾ ¦à¤·à¤¯à¤¾ ¦à¤µà¤¿
¦à¤®à¥£à¤¤à¤µà¥«à¤¢ ¦à¤µà¥§ ¦à¤¸à¤° ¦à¤µà¥§
¦à¤¨à¤¿à¤µà¤¿ ¦à¤ªà¥¡à¤²à¤¿à¤¸
¦à¤¨à¤¿à¤°à¥ à¤µà¥à¤·à¤£ ¦à¤ªà¥«à¤¸à¥à¤¿ ¦à¤¹à¥¨
¦à¤¤à¤¥à¤¾ ¦à¤¸à¤¾à¤®à¤¨à¥§
¦à¤¸à¥ à¥¦à¤¦à¤°à¥¦à¤ªà¥ à¥¦à¤¯à¤«à¥¦ ¦à¤µà¥¨à¤®à¥à¤ª
¦à¤¹à¥¨ ¦à¤¤à¤¥à¤¾ ¦à¤¦à¥¢à¤¸à¤°à¥ ¦à¤³à¤°
¦à¤ªà¥¡à¤²à¤¿à¤¸ ¦à¤ºà¥¬à¤µà¥ ¦à¤¹à¥¨,
¦à¤°à¤¸à¥ ¦à¤¹à¤¾à¤²à¤¤ ¦à¤®à¥§à¤¢
¦à¤¨à¤µà¥à¤¸à¤²à¤¿à¤¯à¥«à¤¢ ¦à¤¦à¥à¤µà¤¾à¤°à¤¾
¦à¤µà¤¹à¥© ¦à¤¦à¤µà¤° ¦à¤µà¤¿à¤¸à¥ ¦à¤µà¥«
¦à¤¬à¥¡à¤²à¤¾à¤µà¤° ¦à¤²à¥§ ¦à¤¼à¤¾à¤¨à¤¾
¦à¤¸à¤¢à¤à¤µ ¦à¤¨à¤¹à¥ à¤¢ ¦à¤¹à¥¨à¥¤
¦à¤°à¤¿à¤ªà¥«à¤°à¥à¤¿ ¦à¤µà¥§ ¦à¤¥à¤¨à¥à¤¤
¦à¤®à¥§à¤¢ ¦à¤°à¤¾à¤·à¥à¤¿à¥à¤°à¥ à¤¯
¦à¤®à¤¾à¤¨à¤µà¤¾à¤§à¤¿à¤µà¤¾à¤° ¦à¤¦à¤¯à¥«à¤· ¦à¤¨à¥§
¦à¤ªà¥£à¤·à¥à¤ ¦à¤¸à¤¢à¥¦ ¦à¥§à¥¦à¥¨ ¦à¤ªà¤°
¦à¤®à¤¾à¤¿à¤µà¤¾à¥¼à¤¾ ¦à¤®à¥§à¤¢ ¦à¤ªà¥¡à¤²à¤¿à¤¸
¦à¤¦à¥à¤µà¤¾à¤°à¤¾ ¦à¤¦à¤¾à¤¶à¤¿à¤² ¦à¤µà¥
¦à¤·à¤¨ ¦à¤¯à¤«à¥¦à¤¦à¤¨à¥¦à¤¦à¤°à¥¦ ¦à¤µà¥«
¦à¤«à¤°à¥à¤¼à¥ ¦à¤µà¤¹à¤¾ ¦à¤¹à¥¨à¥¤ ¦à¤§à¤¸
¦à¤¸à¤¿à¤¨à¤¾ ¦à¤µà¥§ ¦à¤¸à¤¾à¤¥- ¦à¤¸à¤¾à¤¥
¦à¤°à¤¾à¤·à¥à¤¿à¥à¤°à¥ à¤¯
¦à¤®à¤¾à¤¨à¤µà¤¾à¤§à¤¿à¤µà¤¾à¤° ¦à¤¦à¤¯à¥«à¤· ¦à¤¨à¥§
¦à¤¸à¤¢à¤¤à¥«à¤·à¤ªà¥¡à¤°/ ¦à¤ªà¥«à¤¢à¤¼à¥§à¤°
¦à¤®à¥§à¤¢ ¦à¤¹à¥¡à¤¨ ¦à¤¤à¤¥à¤¾à¤µà¤¥à¤¿à¤¤
¦à¤®à¥¡à¤ à¤à¥§à¥¼ ¦à¤µà¥ ¦à¤¶à¤¿à¤µà¤¾à¤¯à¤¤
¦à¤ªà¤° ¦à¤à¥ ¦à¤¨à¤¿à¤·à¥à¤ªà¤µà¥à¤·
¦à¤¼à¤¾à¤¢à¤º ¦à¤µà¤°à¤¾à¤¨à¥§ ¦à¤µà¤¾
¦à¤¦à¤·à¥à¤°à¤¹ ¦à¤µà¤¿à¤¯à¤¾ ¦à¤¹à¥¨ ¦à¤¤à¤¥à¤¾
¦à¤ªà¥¡à¤²à¤¿à¤¸ ¦à¤µà¥ ¦à¤¦à¤¾à¤µà¥«à¤¢ ¦à¤ªà¤°
¦à¤¸à¤µà¤¾à¤²à¤¿à¤¯à¤¾ ¦à¤¨à¤¿à¤¶à¤¾à¤¨ ¦à¤¶à¥¼à¤¾
¦à¤µà¤¿à¤¯à¤¾ ¦à¤¹à¥¨à¥¤ ¦à¤®à¥¡à¤½à¥§
¦à¤¥à¤¤à¥à¤¯à¤¨à¥à¤¤ ¦à¤¦à¤¶à¥à¤ºà¤°à¥à¤¯
¦à¤¹à¥¨ ¦à¤µà¤¿ ¦à¤¹à¤®à¤¾à¤°à¥§ ¦à¤ªà¥à¤°à¤¦à¥§à¤¶
¦à¤µà¥ ¦à¤¼à¤¿à¤®à¥à¤®à¥§à¤¦à¤¾à¤°
¦à¤®à¥ à¤¡à¤¿à¤¯à¤¾ ¦à¤¨à¥§
¦à¤¦à¤¦à¤¿à¤µà¤¾à¤¸à¤¿à¤¯à¥«à¤¢ ¦à¤µà¥§
¦à¤¼à¥ à¤µà¤¨ ¦à¤´à¤° ¦à¤©à¤¨à¤µà¤¾
¦à¤à¤µà¤¿à¤·à¥à¤¯ ¦à¤¤à¤¯ ¦à¤µà¤°à¤¨à¥§
¦à¤µà¤¾à¤²à¥ ¦à¤§à¤¸ ¦à¤¶à¤¬à¤° ¦à¤µà¥«
¦à¤¬à¤¿à¤¨à¤¾ ¦à¤¼à¥©à¤º ¦à¤µà¤¿à¤¯à¥§
¦à¤¸à¤°à¤µà¤¾à¤° ¦à¤µà¥§ ¦à¤µà¤¥à¤¨à¤¾à¤¨à¥¡à¤¸à¤¾à¤°
¦à¤¼à¤¸ ¦à¤µà¤¾ ¦à¤¤à¤¸ ¦à¤»à¤¾à¤ª ¦à¤¦à¤¿à¤¯à¤¾à¥¤
¦à¤¸à¤°à¤µà¤¾à¤° ¦à¤µà¥« ¦à¤¤à¥« ¦à¤ºà¥¡à¤¨à¤¾à¤µ
¦à¤µà¥ ¦à¤ªà¥¼à¥ ¦à¤¹à¥¨ ¦à¤¦à¥§à¤¶
¦à¤¼à¤¾à¤¯à¥§ ¦à¤à¤¾à¥¼ ¦à¤®à¥§à¤¢ ¦à¤ªà¤°
¦à¤®à¥ à¤¡à¤¿à¤¯à¤¾ ¦à¤µà¥« ¦à¤µà¥à¤¯à¤¾ ¦à¤¹à¥«
¦à¤·à¤¯à¤¾ ¦à¤¹à¥¨? ¦à¤¦à¤¨à¤¯à¥§ ¦à¤¬à¤¸à¥à¤¤à¤°
¦à¤·à¤¾à¤¢à¤µà¥«à¤¢ ¦à¤®à¥§à¤¢ ¦à¤ºà¤²à¤¿à¤¯
¦à¤¼à¤²à¤¾à¤¯à¥§ ¦à¤·à¤¯à¥§ ¦à¤¸à¤°à¥«à¤¢
¦à¤µà¥« ¦à¤¦à¥§à¤¶à¤¿à¤¯à¥§, ¦à¤¬à¤²à¤¾à¤¤à¥à¤µà¤°
¦à¤ªà¥ à¥¼à¤¿à¤¤ ¦à¤¹à¤¼à¤¾à¤°à¥«à¤¢
¦à¤²à¥¼à¤µà¤¿à¤¯à¥«à¤¢ ¦à¤¸à¥§ ¦à¤®à¤¿à¤²à¤¿à¤¯à¥§,
¦à¤®à¤¾à¤° ¦à¤¡à¤¾à¤²à¥§ ¦à¤·à¤¯à¥§
¦à¤¹à¤¼à¤¾à¤°à¥«à¤¢ ¦à¤²à¥«à¤·à¥«à¤¢ ¦à¤µà¥§
¦à¤ªà¤°à¤¿à¤µà¤¾à¤°à¥«à¤¢ ¦à¤µà¥ ¦à¤¦à¤¢à¤¶à¥«
¦à¤®à¥§à¤¢ ¦à¤½à¤¾à¤¢à¤µà¤¨à¥§ ¦à¤µà¥
¦à¤¹à¤¿à¤®à¥à¤®à¤¤ ¦à¤µà¥ à¤¼à¤¿à¤¯à¥§à¥¤
¦à¤µà¤µà¥à¤¤ ¦à¤¹à¥¨ ¦à¤¥à¤à¥ ¦à¤à¥ ¦à¤§à¤¨
¦à¤¦à¤¦à¤¿à¤µà¤¾à¤¸à¤¿à¤¯à¥«à¤¢ ¦à¤µà¥§ ¦à¤¸à¤¾à¤¥
¦à¤¼à¥« ¦à¤¹à¤® ¦à¤¤à¤¥à¤¾ ¦à¤µà¤¥à¤¿à¤¤
¦à¤¸à¤à¥à¤¯ ¦à¤¸à¤®à¤¾à¤¼ ¦à¤¨à¥§ ¦à¤µà¤¿à¤¯à¤¾
¦à¤¹à¥¨ ¦à¤©à¤¸à¥§ ¦à¤¸à¥¡à¤§à¤¾à¤° ¦à¤²à¥§à¤¢à¥¤
¦à¤¦à¤ªà¤µà¥« ¦à¤¥à¤¢à¤¦à¤¾à¤¼ ¦à¤¨à¤¹à¥ à¤¢
¦à¤¹à¥¨ ¦à¤¬à¤¸à¥à¤¤à¤° ¦à¤µà¤¾
¦à¤¦à¤¦à¤¿à¤µà¤¾à¤¸à¥ ¦à¤§à¤²à¤¾à¤µà¤¾ ¦à¤¸à¥¡à¤²à¤·
¦à¤°à¤¹à¤¾ ¦à¤¹à¥¨à¥¤ ¦à¤¬à¤¹à¥¡à¤¤ ¦à¤¼à¤²à¥à¤¦à¥
¦à¤²à¤ªà¤¿à¥§à¤¢ ¦à¤¦à¤ª ¦à¤¤à¤µ ¦à¤à¥
¦à¤ªà¤¹à¥¡à¤¡à¤ºà¤¨à¥§ ¦à¤µà¤¾à¤²à¥ ¦à¤¹à¥¨à¥¤
¦à¤¦à¤¼à¤¾à¤¦à¥ ¦à¤µà¥§ ¦à¤¬à¤¾à¤¦ ¦à¤¹à¤®
¦à¤µà¤à¥ ¦à¤§à¤¨ ¦à¤¤à¤µ
¦à¤ªà¤¹à¥¡à¤¡à¤ºà¥§à¤¢ ¦à¤¨à¤¹à¥ ¦à¤¥à¥§ ¦à¤´à¤°
¦à¤¼à¤¬ ¦à¤ªà¤¹à¥¡à¤¡à¤ºà¥§ ¦à¤¤à¥« ¦à¤§à¤¨à¤µà¤¾
¦à¤¸à¤° ¦à¤¼à¤²à¤¾à¤¨à¥§à¥¤ ¦à¤®à¥§à¤°à¥§ ¦à¤¯à¤µ
¦à¤¸à¤¾à¤¥à¥ ¦à¤¨à¥§ ¦à¤µà¤¹à¤¾ ¦à¤¯à¥§ ¦à¤¸à¤¬
¦à¤®à¤¤ ¦à¤²à¤¿à¤¶à¤¿à¤¯à¥§ ¦à¤²à¥«à¤·
¦à¤¸à¥«à¤ºà¥§à¤¢à¤·à¥§à¤¢ ¦à¤¦à¤ª ¦à¤§à¤®à¤µà¥
¦à¤¦à¥§ ¦à¤°à¤¹à¥§ ¦à¤¹à¥¨à¤¢ ¦à¤®à¥¨à¤¢à¤¨à¥§
¦à¤µà¤¹à¤¾ ¦à¤®à¥¨à¤¢ ¦à¤¼à¥« ¦à¤µà¥¡à¤»
¦à¤µà¤¹ ¦à¤°à¤¹à¤¾ ¦à¤¹à¥¢à¤¡ ¦à¤ªà¥¢à¤°à¥
¦à¤¼à¤¿à¤®à¥à¤®à¥§à¤¦à¤¾à¤°à¥ ¦à¤¸à¥§ ¦à¤µà¤¹
¦à¤°à¤¹à¤¾ ¦à¤¹à¥¢à¤¡à¥¤ ¦à¤µà¥«à¤¨ ¦à¤¦à¤¢à¤¶
¦à¤ªà¤° ¦à¤ªà¤¿à¥à¤¿à¥ ¦à¤¬à¤¾à¤¢à¤§à¤µà¤°
¦à¤¶à¤¾à¤¨ ¦à¤µà¥ ¦à¤¤à¤°à¤« ¦à¤¼à¤¾ ¦à¤°à¤¹à¤¾
¦à¤¹à¥« ¦à¤¤à¥« ¦à¤¹à¤® ¦à¤©à¤¸à¤¸à¥§
¦à¤µà¤¹à¥§à¤¢ ¦à¤µà¤¿ ¦à¤©à¤§à¤° ¦à¤®à¤¤
¦à¤¼à¤¾à¤³ ¦à¤¶à¤¾à¤¨ ¦à¤®à¥§à¤¢ ¦à¤·à¤¿à¤°
¦à¤¼à¤¾à¤³à¤·à¥§ ¦à¤´à¤° ¦à¤µà¥« ¦à¤¹à¤®à¤¸à¥§
¦à¤¨à¤¾à¤°à¤¾à¤¼ ¦à¤¹à¥« ¦à¤¼à¤¾à¤¯à¥§ ¦à¤µà¤¿
¦à¤¦à¤ª ¦à¤®à¥¡à¤½à¥§ ¦à¤§à¤®à¤µà¥ ¦à¤¦à¥§
¦à¤°à¤¹à¥§ ¦à¤¹à¥¨à¤¢, ¦à¤¤à¥« ¦à¤«à¤¿à¤° ¦à¤¯à¥§
¦à¤©à¤¸à¤µà¥ ¦à¤¸à¤®à¤½ ¦à¤µà¤¿ ¦à¤µà¥«
¦à¤¬à¤ºà¤¨à¤¾ ¦à¤ºà¤¾à¤¹à¤¤à¤¾ ¦à¤¹à¥¨ ¦à¤¯à¤¾
¦à¤¬à¤ºà¤¾à¤¨à¥§ ¦à¤µà¤¾à¤²à¥§ ¦à¤µà¥«
¦à¤¥à¤ªà¤¨à¤¾ ¦à¤µà¤¿à¤°à¥«à¤§à¥ ¦à¤¸à¤®à¤½à¤¤à¤¾
¦à¤¹à¥¨à¥¤ ¦à¤¹à¤¿à¤®à¤¾à¤¢à¤¶à¥¡ ¦à¤µà¥¡à¤®à¤¾à¤°
¦à¤µà¤¨à¤µà¤¾à¤¸à¥ ¦à¤ºà¥§à¤¤à¤¨à¤¾ ¦à¤¦à¤¶à¥à¤°à¤®
¦à¤µà¤¢à¤µà¤²à¤¨à¤¾à¤° - ¦à¤¦à¤¨à¥à¤¤à¥§à¤µà¤¾à¥¼à¤¾
¦à¤«à¥«à¤¨ ¦à¤¨à¥¦
¦à¥¦à¥à¥®à¥«à¥¬- ¦à¥¨à¥¦à¥¨à¥ªà¥à¥¯/ ¦à¥¯à¥ªà¥¨à¥«à¥¨à¥¬à¥¦\
à¥¦à¥©à¥§ vcadantewada@gmail.com

Back to top
Reply to sender | Reply to group | Reply via web post
Messages in this topic (1)

2.: No Brick In The Wall

Posted by: "Gladson Dungdung" [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Sat Oct 11, 2008 10:25 pm (PDT)

*No Brick In The Wall*

*The dismal state of school education in the tribal state of Jharkhand*

*GLADSON DUNGDUNG**
*

It is 11 am. 12 year-old Sushil and his friends are playing "pitto" (a local
game) in the school premises. They are studying in class 6 at Manikdih
Middle School of Latehar district in Jharkhand, supposed to follow a 10 to 6
time table. 137 children of adjoining villages are enrolled in the school.
It has a provision of 3 teachers. But only two teachers are posted in the
school and one position is still vacant. In the last year, children received
the books four months before their final exams. The teachers are also
uncomfortable with the way school functions but they are helpless. Their
hopes lie on the midday meal, the only reason for children to go to school.

The school also has a village education committee consisting of 15 members,
formed in 2005, assigned to oversee the running of the school. But the
committee is also defunct. The chairperson of the committee, Kripal Singh
says that the members are just not interested and only 5-6 members turn up
in the meetings. Consequently, it has lost the legitimacy. Though the
villagers are not happy with the Khichidi (mixed rice) their children are
being served in the school, they fear having to forgo even this if they
question authorities.

This is the norm rather than exception among government schools in
Jharkhand. The spirit of the right to education is left to die in spite of
the central and the state governments spending a lot of money. The 'Total
Literacy Programme' is the most well-known government-sponsored education
programme, which universalises elementary education at the district level
encouraging community ownership of the school system. The programme is being
implemented by the Jharkhand Education Project Council in all 24 districts
of the state but there is little to show for it apart from the Khichidi.

The education system began to falter in 2002 when the Central Board for
Secondary Education (CBSE) was first introduced here. The latest status
report of the government says 40 lakh children did not get their books in
time. But 80 to 90 percent children still secured good marks and several
schools had all their students passing their exams. But, are good marks all
that the children need to survive in an increasingly competitive world?

While there is a hue and cry about unemployment, the status report shows
that 26 thousand teaching positions in the state are still vacant, 22
thousand of these are in primary schools, the rest in high schools.
Incidentally, the report states that 80 percent schools also do not have
head teachers. Among the 3 lakh children who dropped out from schools, 2
lakh did so in primary school, the rest after matriculation. The major
reasons for dropout are lack of livelihood, the uncertainty, and lack of
money for admission, books, and tuition fees.

Basic facilities are absent in 13,000 government schools of the state. Out
of these 5000 schools lack the basic requirements, 2000 schools do not have
own school buildings and are either run in private buildings, community
halls or Panchayat buildings. 6000 schools even lack the drinking water and
toilet facilities. The education minister of Jharkhand, Bandhu Tirkey says
that the government is working hard to provide the basic facilities to the
schools but the efforts are yet to bear fruit.

Under these circumstances, how can the poor children compete with the kids
of public schools? The present education system is widening of inequality
among the children, which is a severe threat to the society. The ministers,
bureaucrats and teachers are not serious in improving the quality of the
government schools because their kids do not study in these schools.

The government hoped to use the total literacy programme to achieve
universal elementary education  ·an opportunity to promote social justice
through basic education in the country. But even the midday meal could not
bring 4 lakh child labourers to school. A lakh of these have never been to
school.
The dual education system  ¶ one catering to the elites, another to the poor
  ¶is what afflicts the government schools. The Kothari Commission (1964-66),
had introduced the concept of a common school system to address the issues
but it was never implemented. This is despite the Parliament declaring its
commitment to stick to the recommendations.

The common school system would only pave the way in improving the quality
education in the government schools, where the kids of the ministers,
bureaucrats, teachers, government officials and the poor study, play and eat
together. This would be the first step well-taken towards an egalitarian
society.
Gladson Dungdung is a Human Rights Activist associated with the "Child
Rights and You". He can be contacted at gladsonhrights@gmail.com

http://www.tehelka.com/story_main40.asp?filename=Ws041008no_brick.asp

Back to top
Reply to sender | Reply to group | Reply via web post
Messages in this topic (1)

3a.: Re: Chhattisgarh Police Chief at Berkeley: A Report

Posted by: "rahul" [EMAIL PROTECTED] aarohini

Sat Oct 11, 2008 10:29 pm (PDT)

Hate will prevail since schisms are dark and wide
And there are miles to go before it can subside
So while the statists flounder
And activists vainly ponder
The adivasis are being taken for a ghastly ride

Rahul Banerjee

74,Krishnodayanagar,Khandwa naka,Indore,Madhya Pradesh, India-452001

Cell no: +919926791773

webpage: http://rahulbanerjee.notlong.com

blog: http://anar-kali.blogspot.com

Back to top
Reply to sender | Reply to group | Reply via web post
Messages in this topic (15)
3b.: Re: Chhattisgarh Police Chief at Berkeley: A Report

Posted by: "rahul" [EMAIL PROTECTED] aarohini

Sat Oct 11, 2008 10:32 pm (PDT)

The maoists sent the letter to binayak sen so as to initiate a dialectical process that would finally see him in jail. Sending the letter to the media would have resulted instead in sending you manju to jail by the same dialectic. So you should thank your stars that the maoists chose binayak and not you!

Rahul Banerjee

74,Krishnodayanagar,Khandwa naka,Indore,Madhya Pradesh, India-452001

Cell no: +919926791773

webpage: http://rahulbanerjee.notlong.com

blog: http://anar-kali.blogspot.com

--- On Thu, 9/10/08, G MANJU SAINATH <gmanjusainath@gmail.com> wrote:
Subject: Re: [chhattisgarh-net] Chhattisgarh Police Chief at Berkeley: A Report

My question is still unanswered ¢Â - why Maoists had sent letter directly to Dr Binayak Sen, General Secretary of the PUCL or the PUDR three years back instead of informing media. Is it not so that Dr Binayak Sen allowed himself to be used by the Maoists to provide them a cover on the pretext of human rights violations?

Back to top
Reply to sender | Reply to group | Reply via web post
Messages in this topic (15)
3c.: Re: Chhattisgarh Police Chief at Berkeley: A Report

Posted by: "G MANJU SAINATH" [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Sun Oct 12, 2008 5:10 am (PDT)

Dear rahul,

I appreciate your concerns for me but we the media-persons know better how to publish a press note without landing ourselves in jail. Media was publishing such press notes earlier also.
Here I would like to add that the media may boast itself to be the fourth
pillar of the democracy but it has no sanction as such in the constitution. The freedom of _expression_ granted to common man is what media is exercising.
Yet a convention has developed to treat media as the fourth pillar and still people have regards for it. If this was not the case, Ruchir Garg or even Shubhranshu, who visited dense Bastar woods and interviewed
Maoists, would have been the first to cool their heels in the jail under the CSPSA-2005.

Regards

On 10/11/08, rahul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]com> wrote:

> The maoists sent the letter to binayak sen so as to initiate a
> dialectical process that would finally see him in jail. Sending the letter
> to the media would have resulted instead in sending you manju to jail by the
> same dialectic. So you should thank your stars that the maoists chose
> binayak and not you!
>
> Rahul Banerjee
>
> 74,Krishnodayanagar,Khandwa naka,Indore,Madhya Pradesh, India-452001
>
> Cell no: +919926791773
>
> webpage: http://rahulbanerjee.notlong.com
>
> blog: http://anar-kali.blogspot.com
>
> --- On Thu, 9/10/08, G MANJU SAINATH <gmanjusainath@gmail.com<gmanjusainath%40gmail.com>>
> wrote:
> Subject: Re: [chhattisgarh-net] Chhattisgarh Police Chief at Berkeley: A
> Report
>
>
> My question is still unanswered - why Maoists had sent letter directly to
> Dr Binayak Sen, General Secretary of the PUCL or the PUDR three years back
> instead of informing media. Is it not so that Dr Binayak Sen allowed himself
> to be used by the Maoists to provide them a cover on the pretext of human
> rights violations?
>

Back to top
Reply to sender | Reply to group | Reply via web post
Messages in this topic (15)

4a.: Re: Salwa Judum gets NHRC clean chit, Naxals the blame

Posted by: "rahul" [EMAIL PROTECTED] aarohini

Sat Oct 11, 2008 10:31 pm (PDT)

My experience with the NHRC with regard to several complaints lodged with it regarding human rights violations by the police on the Bhil adivasis including their cold blooded extra judicial killing has been a dismal one. ¢Â As Himanshu has so ably pointed out there are several instances in the report where the NHRC team has indicted the state and the salwa judum. So much so that the chief justice has been moved to say that the report is one that causes concern. Under the circumstances one should take what one can get and feel relieved that the NHRC team has not submitted a total no-no of a report that would have led the supreme court to dismiss the petition altogether. There is a tendency among activists to expect the rights monitoring agencies of the state like the NHRC and the Supreme Court to think and act in the same way as we do. if they did do so then we would be out of business.

Rahul Banerjee

74,Krishnodayanagar,Khandwa naka,Indore,Madhya Pradesh, India-452001

Cell no: +919926791773

webpage: http://rahulbanerjee.notlong.com

blog: http://anar-kali.blogspot.com

--- On Wed, 8/10/08, Pravin Patel <reachppatel@yahoo.com> wrote:
From: Pravin Patel <reachppatel@yahoo.com>
Subject: [chhattisgarh-net] Re: Salwa Judum gets NHRC clean chit, Naxals the blame
To: chhattisgarh-[EMAIL PROTECTED]com
Date: Wednesday, 8 October, 2008, 11:20 PM

Dear all
¢Â
I am astonished to see the news in one of the recently launched News channel from Raipur that the ¢Â Supreme Court ¢Â has given clean chit to the state government. Fact is that it is the NHRC report that has was prepared on the basis of the fact finding team under the directions of the Hon ¢â ¹ble Supreme Court of India and the same has been submitted which opines that the Salwa Judum is a spontaneous movement of the tribals taken on their own to counter Naxal menace.

Back to top
Reply to sender | Reply to group | Reply via web post
Messages in this topic (5)

5a.: Re: Revenge of a woman

Posted by: "rahul" [EMAIL PROTECTED] aarohini

Sat Oct 11, 2008 10:34 pm (PDT)

A lovely writeup on a lovely lady. It reminded me of the adivasi sculptor ramkinkar beij. While ramkinkar had the good fortune of getting noticed by Rabindranath Tagore it appears that sona bai flowered in anonymity. Is it my ignorance that i am reading about her for the first time?

Rahul Banerjee

74,Krishnodayanagar,Khandwa naka,Indore,Madhya Pradesh, India-452001

Cell no: +919926791773

webpage: http://rahulbanerjee.notlong.com

blog: http://anar-kali.blogspot.com

--- On Fri, 10/10/08, alok putul <alok.raviwar@gmail.com> wrote:
From: alok putul <alok.raviwar@gmail.com>
Subject: [chhattisgarh-net] Revenge of a woman
To: chhattisgarh-[EMAIL PROTECTED]com
Date: Friday, 10 October, 2008, 10:59 PM

read more-

http://www.raviwar. com/news/ 90_sonabai- chhattisgarh- shampashah. shtml

Back to top
Reply to sender | Reply to group | Reply via web post
Messages in this topic (2)

6a.: Stetsman edit on NHRC report

Posted by: "Nandini Sundar" [EMAIL PROTECTED] nandinisundar

Sat Oct 11, 2008 10:38 pm (PDT)

Statesman 10 October 2008
¦
Flawed report
NHRC defends Salwa Judum in complete turnaround
The report presented to the Supreme Court by a fact-finding team of the National Human Rights Commission exculpating the Salwa Judum is an extraordinary document. It is extraordinary not least because of the context. Just over a fortnight ago this team had submitted a report to the court and indicted this state-run militia formed ostensibly to counter the Naxals who operate in Chhattisgarh. Now it has done a volte-face virtually telling the court that the Salwa Judum is blameless, that it is indeed necessary and that the militia helps to protect tribals who are oppressed by the Naxals. What do we make of this? One will never be sure, of course, of what has transpired behind the scenes to bring about this astounding turnaround ~ but it inspires little faith in agencies that are connected to the state. Every independent observer who has gone to Chhattisgarh (with the possible exception of those patronised by the state) has had harsh words to say about the
Salwa Judum. No less than the Naxals they are responsible for unleashing violence on the tribals, displacing them and pushing state agendas. Important among this, as the media has often reported, is to open up territory rich in forests and minerals for subsequent exploitation by rogue entrepreneurs.
It is common knowledge that the Salwa ¦ Judum ¦ routinely and forcibly recruits child warriors ~ in the manner that they are pressed into war in failed states like the Congo, Liberia and Sierra Leone. Even a team set up by the Planning Commission and led by the respected bureaucrat and land reform expert, Mr Debabrata Bandopadhyay, had posted a severe indictment of the Salwa Judum ¦ and recommended that it be wound up. Alongside, this exculpation of a patently illegal militia, comes a severe indictment of the Naxals, at whose door is laid the entire burden of blame of unleashing violence on the tribals of the region, with no recognition of the fact that the Maoists in Chhattisgarh enjoy wide backing of the tribals. This is not meant to be a defence of the methods used by the Maoists, but a recognition of the realities on the ground. It is only in passing ~ in the last paragraph ~ that the report mentions the socio-economic deprivation that has resulted in
the ultra-Left phenomenon. One hopes the courts will reject these findings.

Back to top
Reply to sender | Reply to group | Reply via web post
Messages in this topic (2)

Create New Topic | Visit Your Group on the Web

Messages

Visit our website: http://www.cgnet.in

Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Individual | Switch format to Traditional
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

Messages In This Digest (8 Messages)

Messages

Posted by: "vcadantewada ashram" [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Sat Oct 11, 2008 9:36 am (PDT)

Posted by: "Gladson Dungdung" [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Sat Oct 11, 2008 10:25 pm (PDT)

Posted by: "rahul" [EMAIL PROTECTED] aarohini

Sat Oct 11, 2008 10:29 pm (PDT)

Posted by: "rahul" [EMAIL PROTECTED] aarohini

Sat Oct 11, 2008 10:32 pm (PDT)

Posted by: "G MANJU SAINATH" [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Sun Oct 12, 2008 5:10 am (PDT)

Posted by: "rahul" [EMAIL PROTECTED] aarohini

Sat Oct 11, 2008 10:31 pm (PDT)

Posted by: "rahul" [EMAIL PROTECTED] aarohini

Sat Oct 11, 2008 10:34 pm (PDT)

Posted by: "Nandini Sundar" [EMAIL PROTECTED] nandinisundar

Sat Oct 11, 2008 10:38 pm (PDT)

Reply via email to