From: Kon Lovett <konlov...@gmail.com> Subject: [Chicken-hackers] Request to edit manual Foreign type specifiers Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 13:33:47 -0700
> Hi Folks, > > I would like to edit the "Foreign type specifiers" manual section so > pointer entries follow the "optional attribute" convention introduced > by '[nonnull-] c-string*'. I will also add a general note about the > pointer passing/return #f <-> NULL conversion. > > In keeping with the spirit above specifiers like "unsigned-integer" > will become "[unsigned-] integer". > Sure. It's a bit of a mess, that page, anyway, and help in improving the manual is always welcome. But one question remains: does chicken-doc know anything about foreign type specifiers? If not, should it, and what should be the markup? Would using the "[...]" convention make an existing or possible future extension of chicken-doc problematic? cheers, felix _______________________________________________ Chicken-hackers mailing list Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
