On May 28, 2011, at 4:26 AM, Felix wrote: > I would suggest a "<type>" tag, which can be used for foreign- and > (forthcoming) > specialization type specifiers. It is generic enough to be re-usable for > different > type-related purposes and having multiple entities of type "type" in the same > document is confusing enough for the reader to be avoided.
OK, <type> now works in chicken-doc and qwiki. I have added <type> tags to the foreign types documentation, reorganized the page and expanded its contents. If you like, have a look at one of: http://api.call-cc.org/doc/foreign/types http://wiki.call-cc.org/man/4/Foreign%20type%20specifiers Jim _______________________________________________ Chicken-hackers mailing list Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
